Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Tumori ; 106(2 SUPPL):70, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1109838

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been declared global pandemic and Italy is one of the first and heavily affected countries. Cancer patients are a population at higher risk from COVID-19 both for intrinsic fragility bound to their underlying disease and oncologic treatment delay. Aim of our survey was to investigate how cancer patients perceived their health condition, their clinical management and information communication by their medical oncologists during the pandemic. Methods: Between 15th April and 1st May 2020 a survey was submitted to cancer patients under treatment at hospitals of Marche Region which had been invested by the pandemic. It consisted of questions regarding the perception of personal safety, continuity of cancer care and information quality provided by the Oncology Department and individual psychological distress. Results: A total of 661 patients participated in the survey;60.2% was female and 40.4% was aged between 46 and 65. Almost all of the attendees (97.7%) stated that the Oncologic Department complied with the appropriate safety standards and 78% was reassured about their concerns during the medical interview, but 41% was worried of being at higher risk of infection upon entry into the Oncology Department and 53.3% felt being at greater risk of infection because of chemotherapy treatment in general. The majority of the participants (62.2%) felt that postponing cancer treatment could reduce its efficacy, however 80% declared they did not feel abandoned at the time of treatment delay. 79.4% of the attendees felt more worried for their underlying disease in this emergency situation, but the mood worsened only for 34.2% of the participants. Conclusions: Our survey reveals that Oncology Departments have been considered worthy of the emergency in terms of safety standards and care management by cancer patients. However, the majority of attendees perceived the mutual negative influence between their underlying oncologic disease and risk of Sars-CoV-2 infection and manifested concerns about their health condition highlighting the need for special measures to ensure safe continuity of care.

2.
Clinical Cancer Research ; 26(18 SUPPL), 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-992041

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been declared a global pandemic, and Italyis one of the first and most heavily affected countries. Cancer patients are a population at higher risk from COVID-19 both for intrinsic fragility bound to their underlying disease and oncologic treatment delay. The aim of our survey was to investigate how cancer patients perceived their health condition, their clinical management, and informationcommunication by their medical oncologists during the pandemic. Methods: Between 15th April and 1st May, 2020, a survey was submitted to cancer patients under treatment athospitals of Marche Region that had been invested by the pandemic. It consisted of questions regarding theperception of personal safety, continuity of cancer care, and information quality provided by the OncologyDepartment and individual psychological distress. Results: A total of 661 patients participated in the survey;60.2% were female and 40.4% were aged between 46and 65. Almost all of the attendees (97.7%) stated that the Oncologic Department complied with the appropriatesafety standards, and 78% were reassured about their concerns during the medical interview, but 41% were worriedof being at higher risk of infection upon entry into the Oncology Department and 53.3% felt at greater risk of infectionbecause of chemotherapy treatment in general. The majority of the participants (62.2%) felt that postponing cancertreatment could reduce its efficacy;however, 80% declared they did not feel abandoned at the time of treatmentdelay. 79.4% of the attendees felt more worried for their underlying disease in this emergency situation, but themood worsened for only 34.2% of the participants. Conclusions: Our survey reveals that Oncology Departments have been considered worthy of the emergency interms of safety standards and care management by cancer patients. However, the majority of attendees perceivedthe mutual negative influence between their underlying oncologic disease and risk of Sars-CoV-2 infection andmanifested concerns about their health condition, highlighting the need for special measures to ensure safecontinuity of care.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL